The 50-Page Procedure That Nobody Reads: Why Your "Safe Systems of Work" Are Hallucinations
We write documentation to satisfy lawyers and auditors, not to guide human beings under pressure. If your safety procedure is impossible to use in a muddy trench at 2:00 AM, it doesn't exist. It is just expensive confetti.
Let’s have an uncomfortable moment of honesty about how we write Safety Procedures (SOPs), Method Statements, and Risk Assessments.
Here is the process in most organizations: A new high-risk activity is identified. The Safety Engineer sits down in an ergonomic chair in a climate-controlled office. They open Microsoft Word. They copy-paste the relevant legislative articles (to show compliance). They add a sprawling section on "Roles and Responsibilities" (which nobody reads). They add a generic flowchart they found online. Finally, they add 10 pages of dense, text-heavy "General Precautions," covering everything from hydration to meteor strikes.
Three days later, they hit print. The result is a beautiful, 45-page document titled: "Standard Operating Procedure for Confined Space Entry (Rev 04)."
The Engineer feels good. They have covered every risk. They have covered every liability. They are "compliant." They put it in a binder on the shelf, and upload a PDF to SharePoint. Job done.
Now, let’s leave the office and go to the real world.
It is 2:00 AM. It is raining. The night shift maintenance crew needs to enter a sewage tank to fix a critical blockage. The pressure is on from production to get it running.
Do they walk back to the office, log into SharePoint, and scroll through your 45-page PDF on a smartphone screen? Do they find the binder and read a novel while standing in the mud? No.
They rely on two things:
Tribal Knowledge: (What the foreman told them).
Memory: (What they remember from the last time they did it).
If their memory is imperfect, or if the foreman takes a shortcut, an accident happens.
Your 45-page document didn't fail because the workers are "lazy" or "stupid." It failed because you designed it for a filing cabinet, not for a human being under stress.
Part 1: The Science of Why We Fail (Cognitive Load)
Why do smart professionals write unreadable documents? The answer lies in the psychology of Cognitive Load Theory (John Sweller).
The human brain has a very limited capacity for "Working Memory." Think of it like the RAM in your computer. It can only hold 3-5 pieces of new information at any one time.
When a worker is on a high-risk job, their working memory is already full:
The noise of the generator.
The heat of the suit.
The pressure from the boss.
The complexity of the task itself.
Their brain is running at 95% capacity just trying to do the job. Then, you hand them a wall of dense text. You are asking their brain to process another 50% load.
The brain cannot do it. It enters "Cognitive Overload." So, what does the brain do? It deletes the new information to protect itself. The worker scans the page, their eyes glaze over, they find the signature line, sign it, and hand it back.
They haven't absorbed a single instruction. You haven't trained them; you have just overwhelmed them.
Part 2: The "CYA" (Cover Your Ass) Syndrome
If we know nobody reads them, why do we write them this way?
Because deep down, in the dark corners of our profession, we admit that we aren't writing these procedures for the operator. We are writing them for the Prosecutor.
We are terrified of liability. So, we pack every possible warning, every caveat, every redundant instruction into the text. The goal is to ensure that if an accident happens, we can stand in court, point to page 37, paragraph 4, and say: > "See, Judge? We told him not to do that."
This is the "CYA" (Cover Your Ass) Mentality. It is a brilliant legal strategy, but it is a catastrophic safety strategy.
By burying the 3 critical instructions that will actually save a life inside 40 pages of legal fluff, you guarantee that the worker will miss them. You have traded Operational Clarity for Legal Immunity.
Furthermore, this strategy often backfires in court. A smart prosecutor will ask: "Mr. Safety Manager, do you reasonably expect a welder to read and memorize this 50-page document before every shift?" If the answer is "No," you have just admitted your system is a sham.
Part 3: The IKEA vs. Aviation Test
If you want to see how to do it right, look outside our industry.
The IKEA Test: IKEA sells complex furniture to millions of people with zero carpentry skills, speaking 100 different languages. How do they ensure the furniture is built safely and correctly? Do they provide a 50-page thesis on "The Structural Integrity of Particle Board"? No. They give you 4 pages of pictures.
Step 1. (Image of screw going into hole).
Step 2. (Image of panel A connecting to panel B).
Warning Icon. (Don't stand on it).
IKEA understands user experience. Safety Departments do not.
The Aviation Test: When an Airbus A320 engine catches fire at 20,000 feet, do the pilots open a textbook and start reading about the history of jet engines? No. They pull out a QRH (Quick Reference Handbook).
It is not prose. It is a brutal, stripped-down checklist.
Engine Fire Switch........CONFIRM.....PUSH
Agent 1.........................DISCH
It is designed for a human brain under extreme stress. It gives them exactly the information they need to survive the next 60 seconds. Nothing else.
Our safety procedures should look like a pilot's checklist, not a lawyer's contract.
Part 4: The "De-Bloat" Protocol (How to Fix It)
We have created a culture of Shelfware—documents that live on shelves, gathering dust, existing only to satisfy auditors.
If you want your procedures to actually be used in the field, you need to butcher them. Be ruthless. Here is the protocol.
1. The "90% Purge"
Take your current 50-page SOP. I guarantee that 90% of it is fluff: definitions, scope, document control tables, generic warnings that apply to everything ("Be careful"). Delete it. If a sentence doesn't tell the worker what to do or how to stay safe right now, it is noise. Get rid of it. Move the legal requirements to a separate "Policy Manual" that stays in the office.
2. Move from Prose to Checklists
Stop writing paragraphs. Nobody reads paragraphs in the field. Convert your "how-to" section into a Critical Control Checklist.
Bad: "Ensure that the excavation is properly shored according to engineering standards to prevent collapse..."
Good: "Is shoring installed and locked? [Yes/No]"
3. Visuals > Text
A photograph of a "Correctly Guarded Machine" next to a photograph of an "Incorrectly Guarded Machine" with a big red X is worth 1,000 words of text. Use arrows. Use flowcharts. Use color coding (Red/Green). If your procedure looks like a comic book, you are winning. If it looks like a legal deposition, you are losing.
4. The "Mud Test" (User Validation)
Never approve a procedure from your desk. Print the draft. Go to the site. Find the worker who will actually do the job. Drop the procedure in a puddle of mud. Pick it up. Hand it to the worker and say: "Tell me the three most important steps in 30 seconds."
If they can't do it, your document has failed. Rewrite it.
The Bottom Line
We need to stop measuring our professional worth by the weight of the paper we produce. Complexity is not a sign of sophistication. It is a sign of lazy thinking.
A rough, 1-page, mud-stained checklist that gets used every day by the crew in the trench is infinitely superior to a pristine, 50-page manual that stays on the shelf in the CEO's office.
Stop writing for the lawyer. Start writing for the guy holding the wrench.
Comments
Post a Comment